Translate

Saturday, June 27, 2015

St Augustine & the heartbreak & desire of sin,

St Augustine & the heartbreak & desire of sin,

“Who am I? What kind of man am I? What evil have I not done? Or if there is evil that I have not done, what evil is there that I have not spoken? If there is any that I have not spoken, what evil is there that I have not willed to do?” (Bk. IX, 1, p. 181)

“But my sin was this, that I looked for pleasure, beauty, and truth not in Him but in myself and his other creatures, and this search led me instead to pain, confusion, and error.” (Bk. I, 20, p. 40–41)

Eusebius [Prayer to practice the Golden Rule]


Eusebius [Prayer to practice the Golden Rule]

I ran across this quote from Eusebius when skimming through his works to refute the false doctrine taught by Andy Stanley, it was super convicting, thought I'd pass it along.  
“May I be an enemy to no one and the friend of what abides eternally.
May I never quarrel with those nearest me, and be reconciled quickly if I should.
May I never plot evil against others, and if anyone plot evil against me,
may I escape unharmed and without the need to hurt anyone else.
May I love, seek and attain only what is good.
May I desire happiness for all and harbor envy for none.
May I never find joy in the misfortune of one who has wronged me.
May I never wait for the rebuke of others, but always rebuke myself until I make reparation.
May I gain no victory that harms me or my opponent.
May I reconcile friends who are mad at each other.
May I, insofar as I can, give all necessary help to my friends and to all who are in need.
May I never fail a friend in trouble.
May I be able to soften the pain of the
grief stricken and give them comforting words.
May I respect myself.
May I always maintain control of my emotions.
May I habituate myself to be gentle, and never angry with others because of circumstances.
May I never discuss the wicked or what they have done, but know good people and follow in their footsteps.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Andy Stanley: ignoramus or liar ?



This post is regarding Atheists, pseudo-historians (like Dan Brown) & pseudo-pastors (like Andy Stanley & Rob Bell)….and their assertions that Constantine forced a “temple model” religion (aka imposed Christianity) on the people of his empire, thereby corrupting Christianity through Imperialism.  This assertion is absolutely wrong, according to the writer Eusebius, who was the ancient Historian who recorded the events regarding the Early Church. Eusebius recorded the Emperor’s Edict of 313, “We have LONG intended that freedom of worship should not be deigned but that EVERYONE should have the right to practice his religion as he choose.  Accordingly we have had given orders that Christians and ALL OTHERS should be permitted to Keep the Faith of their own sect and worship.” (Quote occasionally CAPSLOCKED for emphasis by myself).  

Its clear that Constantine’s empire was one of the first large scale governments to TRULY legalize freedom of religion, often to an extent greater than that of America today, therefore Andy Stanley’s assertions that Constantine corrupted Christianity by establishing “temple model” is without question wrong. Therefore Mr. Stanley is either #1 – completely ignorant of Church History, making him derelict in his duties as a teacher or #2 – he knows the history and purposely lies about it to advance his own personal agenda.

As a follow-up I’d recommend all Christians read the writings of the Early Church, even stuff I personally don’t agree with has an amazing amount of knowledge, intellect & understanding in it as you can see these people are TRYING to faithfully apply Biblical truths to their lives. I’d also recommend reading Dr. Paul Maier’s translation of Eusebius’ The Church History; the quote from above is from Book 10, chapter 5 (available at Amazon, link provided).

 @@@
For some context: here’s a little Andy Stanley FYI from his recent sermon series “Brand New”.

So what’s wrong with “temple model”?

For the past few weeks, [Andy] Stanley has been exhorting Christians to ditch their traditional “temple model” ways.  The “temple model,” as defined by Stanley, “grants extraordinary power to sacred men in sacred places who determine the meaning of sacred texts.”  “The temple model is you-centered,” Stanley explained.  “The heart of the temple model is this question: what must I do or believe to make things and keep things right between God and me?”

So basically, the problem with temple model is it’s Gospel-focused? Andy Stanley must really hate the gospel to be so outspoken against its emphasis. 

* note things to avoid at all costs as Andy Stanley explains the Temple Model as one that you see in so many ancient (and current) religions. It is centered around: Sacred Places, Sacred Texts, Sacred Men & Sincere/Superstitious Followers.

 

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Begin to Read the Church Fathers: Reading List & Podcast with my hero - Michael Haykin

Church-Fathers-300x253

Begin to Read the Church Fathers: Reading List & Podcast [Michael Haykin | AUDIO]

From the Center for Ancient Christian Studies:
Michael A.G. Haykin
Michael A.G. Haykin
…After sharing his story of how he came to study Patristics at Wycliffe College in Toronto, he fields a number of questions regarding the how and why of early church study. Below is a summary of Dr. Haykin’s thoughts which the aspiring scholar might find invaluable.

Why study the fathers no matter what field you are in?

As Christians we are united to believers across time based upon the teachings of Christ and the apostles. We believe in a Catholic Christianity. The Trinitarian and Christological thought of the earliest theologians available to us through their writings are the bedrock of our faith.

Where do I start if I am interested in becoming more familiar with the church fathers?

Here are some good places to start. Also, you can view Dr. Haykin’s Reading Plan for the Latin Fathers.

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Is there work still to be done in the church fathers?

Absolutely! There remain unexhausted topics even within the major historical figures. Dr. Haykin believes the area of reception history in certain ancient theologians could benefit from more attention.

Audio Here!

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Run From Self-Righteousness by J D Hall

Run From Self-Righteousness

In The Pen by JD Hall
“I’m a sinner, but I’m not as bad as the Duggars. They’re REALLY bad. I would NEVER have thought a thought like that!”
Beloved, there are two types of righteousness.  There is a righteousness that comes from Jesus that is imputed (assigned or designated or accounted) to you by faith – I’ll call it “Christ-righteousness" or "an Alien-righteousness.”  It’s not your righteousness, but it’s on loan to you.  It’s actually Jesus’ righteousness judicially affixed to you.  There is a second type of purported righteous that comes from self; your own attempt at holiness, your effort, and it’s called “self-righteousness.”

“Righteousness” means to “be right with God” in its plainest sense. It is to be “justified” before God.  In other words, the end of righteousness is to be accepted by God.

Therefore, there are two ways or attempts to be right with God; first, to have faith in the accomplished work of Christ in his death, burial and resurrection or secondly, to have faith in your own self, your innate goodness, your effort or attempts at holiness.

Self-righteousness is an enemy of the Gospel.  It is anathema to the Christian faith.  We must hate it and despise it and wage war on it until it dies the brutal, bloody death it deserves.  We have to mortify our own self-righteousness and pray that God crucifies it with Christ.  When we wake up in the morning we will find our self-righteousness has resurrected itself and like a theologically-decrepit zombie it has raised again and latched onto our soul, and so we must strike it dead again with Scripture.  Self-righteousness is a satanic parasite that feeds off of our good deeds and positive self-image and is watered by the work of our hands and soothes us with a deadly siren’s call to rest in our effort instead of Christ’s.  Self-righteousness convinces us that we’re innately good and not as much a sinner as the next sinner.  That beast affirms us and whispers softly in our ear and tells us that we’re not that bad and definitely not as bad as the guy that’s really bad.  We cannot negotiate with this enemy, self-righteousness, or cozy up to him or have an amicable relationship.  We must drive the Cross through its heart and take its scalp.

But where can we find refuge if we wage war with self-righteousness?  Where can we run when we confess our sinful state?  Where is our safe harbor when we sail the ship through a sea of our own committed sin?  Self-righteousness is a brutal boyfriend and the end of him is death, but there’s a certain facade of safety there.  Like battered women, we know that self-righteousness has a poisonous grip on us, but think “at least he provides.”  We’re used to self-righteousness and there’s a comfortable familiarity with him.  Where can we go if we were to cast off the notion that we’re not hopelessly sinful creatures?  If we confess ALL of our sin and not just some of it, where can we find reprieve from God Almighty’s prosecution?  “Let us hide here in self-righteousness,” we think.  After all, where can we turn when we expose the sheer and utter nakedness of our transgressions?

The answer, beloved, is that we run to Christ’s righteousness.  We must turn to Christ’s obedience.  We must run to Christ’s right-standing with the Father and stand behind him as a human-divine shield for our wickedness.  We must run away from self-righteousness stark naked and take on the righteous cover of Christ.

Kill your self-righteousness, Christian…before it kills you.

reviewing the Death of Christianity here

reviewing the Death of Christianity here

Sunday, May 17, 2015

"From Fear to Faith" - Sunday School on John 6 Jesus walks on water & calms the storm


From Fear to Faith
Intro quote –
John Calvin – “Nothing is more fearful to convict sinners than the words, "I am Jesus whom you persecute;" nothing more powerful to comfort saints than this, "I am Jesus whom you love." If we have received Christ Jesus the Lord, though the night be dark, and the wind high, and the waves of life crash about, yet we may comfort ourselves, we shall be at the shore before long as he is with us.”

Read passage –

Matthew 14:22-33 (ESV) - Jesus Walks on the Water

22 Immediately he made the disciples get into the boat and go before him to the other side, while he dismissed the crowds. 23 And after he had dismissed the crowds, he went up on the mountain by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone, 24 but the boat by this time was a long way from the land, beaten by the waves, for the wind was against them. 25 And in the fourth watch of the night he came to them, walking on the sea. 26 But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, and said, “It is a ghost!” and they cried out in fear. 27 But immediately Jesus spoke to them, saying, “Take heart; it is I. Do not be afraid.”
28 And Peter answered him, “Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.” 29 He said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat and walked on the water and came to Jesus. 30 But when he saw the wind, he was afraid, and beginning to sink he cried out, “Lord, save me.” 31 Jesus immediately reached out his hand and took hold of him, saying to him, “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?” 32 And when they got into the boat, the wind ceased. 33 And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.”
Jesus Walks on Water & John 6: 15 – 21 ESV
15 Perceiving then that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, Jesus withdrew again to the mountain by himself.
16 When evening came, his disciples went down to the sea, 17 got into a boat, and started across the sea to Capernaum. It was now dark, and Jesus had not yet come to them. 18 The sea became rough because a strong wind was blowing. 19 When they had rowed about three or four miles, they saw Jesus walking on the sea and coming near the boat, and they were frightened. 20 But he said to them, “It is I; do not be afraid.” 21 Then they were glad to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat was at the land to which they were going.
@@@
            Reminder from last week, my contention is that John is not just a regular biography but is a theological argument where John is using certain miracles as evidence to convince you that Jesus is not only the promised Messiah described in the OT but is actually God himself, deity.
Miracles in John:
#1 Turning water into wine ch 2
#2 The healing of the official’s son ch 4
#3 The healing at the pool of Bethesda ch 5
#4 The multiplication of the bread & fish ch 6
#5 is 2 fold: Walking on water & the calming of the storm ch 6
#6 healing of a man born blind ch 9
# 7 raising Lazarus from the dead ch 11
In this same story in Matthew 14, Matthew adds another element, the Apostles are in the boat, they’ve been struggling against the wind & waves for hours & from the distant edge of their lantern light & flashing lightning they can just make out a figure walking as along a path over the tops of the waves & Shaggy says to Scooby, “It’s a ggggggggg-ghost!” & then Matthew shares the account of Peter walking on water, John does not.  Why doesn’t John even speak about Peter walking on the water like Matthew does?  If I am correct on my take on John being written differently than Matthew, Mark & Luke then its b/c John’s emphasis, his hero, the center of John’s message is about Christ (not Peter).
All throughout the Gospel of John, we are reminded time and time again that John's purpose is to let us know who exactly is Jesus. We see who he is in his encounters with people like Nicodemus, the Woman at the Well, and the invalid at the pool of Bethesda. We are introduced to his purpose, his person, and his compassion. But more than anything we are reminded throughout this Gospel that Jesus is God.
How did Jesus do it?
-       #1 Jesus projected a vision of himself from the shore?   But the “vision” got into the boat with them, Peter at least touches the vision in Matthew’s account
-       #2  The wind had pushed the disciples closer to land than they thought & saw Jesus walking either on the seashore or a sandbar, not on the water?  But many of the disciples were professional sailors/fishermen, so their confusion seems unlikely
-       #3  This was a pious legend that grew over the centuries after the death of Jesus, a story like Poseidon or Neptune?  But John was an eye witness (unlike Mark or Luke) Also all of the gospels were written within John’s lifetime, in the 1st century not 100s of years later
-       #4  Or Jesus’ power over Nature is proof of Christ’s divinity  This passage through the next 200 years or so is used in various Early Church services, writings, creeds & confession to defend the idea that Christ is in fact divine.  This passage exemplified Christ’s deity to the Jews because they had this idea of Yahweh (God) having power over the sea (which is often seen as an example of Chaos) this is paralleled in the passage in Geneses 1 where the Spirit of God hovers over the waters & begins to create order out of Chaos. In Scripture, Yahweh, the one, true Lord of all, is described as walking upon the water (Psalm 77:16–20; Habakkuk 3:15).
Any Questions so far?
@@@
1 of the interesting points in both this miracle & the last is Jesus’ example of the importance of prayer.  Jesus prays over the bread & fish before miracle last time & instead of getting wrapped up in other people’s expectations for his life, Jesus pushes everyone else away for hours to pray alone on the mountaintop before walking to the disciples on the sea.  
We know from the passage that the crowds had seen Jesus institute free universal healthcare with his miraculous healings & a version of 1st century food stamps & WIC programs in feeding the crowds for frees & so the crowds wanting to force Jesus to be king, but Jesus does not want to be king.  Why, do you think that was?  Was Jesus a king & what kind of king of what kind of kingdom? Jesus removes Himself from people whose goals were not consistent with His Father's plan for him. Christ was here to obey the Father. Nothing else was acceptable to Him. He would stand for no deviation from the plan the Father had put into place.
-       If you remember I told you it was rare for the same event to be discussed in all 4 gospels last week, but there is another occasion where that happens when Jesus admits before Pilate that he is a king, but one not of this world
-       He is labeled at his execution as the King of the Jews
-       The book of Revelation cites him as a king over & over again, not just a king but the King of all kings & the Lord over all lords.
-        
Closing quote – John Calvin
“The Lord often makes his people fall into alarming dangers, that they may more plainly and familiarly recognize him in their deliverance.”

@@@@@
Notes on “if the boat was is the middle of the sea”
John Calvin
Verse 17 – Calvin says not to assume they were in the middle of the lake
“Those who conjecture that they were still about the middle of the lake when Christ appeared to them, because John says that they had then advanced about twenty-five or thirty furlongs, are led into a mistake by supposing that they had sailed to the farther or opposite bank; for Bethsaida, near which town, Luke tells us, the miracle was performed, (Luke 9:10,) and Capernaum, which the ship reached, (John 6:16,) were situated on the same coast.
Pliny, in his fifth book, states that this lake was six miles in breadth, and sixteen in length. Josephus (in the third book of the Wars of the Jews) assigns to it 12.5 miles in length, and 5 miles in breadth; we may easily infer how little the one description differs from the other. So far as relates to the present sailing, my opinion is, that they did not go over so great a space by direct sailing, but through being driven about by the tempest.