Translate

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

God uses Guinnes to reduce drunkeness and extend the Gospel


God and Guinness?

To many, this juxtaposition may appear sacrilegious, if not rightfully awkward. But only those who know the story behind the Guinness family can fully appreciate the connection between the two; that is, how the national drink of Ireland became arguably the greatest instrument for propagating the Gospel.
Here are some interesting tidbits I gleaned in my study of the Guinness family:
  • The trademark thick foam head of Guinness is the result of the presence of nitrogen. This is why one should drink Guinness form a glass and not the can or bottle.
  • Hendry Grattan Guinness, the grandson of Arthur Guinness, was a contemporary evangelist whose name was often mentioned alongside the likes of D.L . Moody and Charles Spurgeon. His son married Hudson Taylor’s daughter.
  • Today, nearly ten million glasses of Guinness are consumed daily, nearly 2 billion pints a year.
  • Arthur Guinness, the founder of Guinness, founded the first Sunday School in Ireland.
  • In 2003, a researcher from University of Wisconsin concluded that a pint of a Guinness a day actually bolsters hear health and is infinitely better for you than the caffeine in coffee or the high fructose corn syrup in soda.
  •  
Calling – Business as Mission
Arthur Guinness was a man of faith.  Born in 1724 in a family where his father was an archbishop, he embodied the words that were his family motto: Spes mea in deo (My hope is in God). His influence from the famous revivalist John Wesley inspired and enabled him to use his God-given talents in entrepreneurship as a vehicle to follow the footsteps of Jesus Christ. Wesley’s mantra which is known as the statement, “Make all you can, save all you can, and give all you can” profoundly impacted Arthur Guinness’ perspective in life and his wealth.


In mid 1700 in Ireland, there was a phenomena called “The Gin Craze.”  An overwhelming large number of people were drinking whiskey and gin as their primary beverage. Water was deemed unsafe due to the micro-organisms and mysterious diseases found in water unbeknownst to everyone. The parliament forbidded the importation of liquor in 1689, so the Irish and British began making their own. This led to excessive drunkenness resulting in a poverty-ridden, crime-infested time. Statistics show that every sixth house in English was a gin house.
Arthur Guinness was infuriated with this drunkenness. He constantly prayed to God to do something with the alcoholism on the streets of Ireland. In fact, he felt God calling him to “Make a drink that men will drink that will be good for them.” He then developed a dark stout beer called Guinness. Guinness contained so much iron that people felt full before they can drink more pints. During its creation, the alcohol level was lower than gin and whiskey.
Guinness truly was doing business as a mission instead of business for mission. With the preserving influence of the salt and penetrating influence of light, his life truly exemplified Lord’s mandate to be the salt and light of the world.

The Legacy of Guinness
If the story of the Guinness story ended with a man of Arthur Guinness, it would be a fairly small footnote in pages of history. Many of Guinness’ accomplishments were done in his family by teaching values undergirded in his biblical faith and relationship with Jesus Christ. He created a family culture that focused on giving generously and investing in his people.
The grandson of Arthur Guinness named Hendry Grattan Guinness became a foremost evangelist spreading the Good News. Another descendant of Guinness received five million pounds sterling for a wedding gift, but then moved his new bride into the slums to utilize his resources to eradicate the poverty in the land.
Another Guinness heir became Lord Iveagh as a member of the House of Lords due to his philanthropic efforts. In his new role, he brought wholesale changes in the legal system. In that time, people used to have dueling on the streets. Like you see in the movies, people would turn around and shoot each other whenever there was conflict. Lord Iveagh said you can’t do this anymore. The biblical principle said if you’ve got something against somebody, you need to talk to them; if they won’t change or refuse to listen, you will have a legal representation that will go to public court with a witness. This is how he embedded the biblical principles into the legal system.

Guinness – A Great Place to Work
If you think Google or Facebook has great perks, Guinness was one of them. A key belief that the Guinness family subscribed to were the belief that “You cannot make money from people unless you are willing for people to make money from you.” This starkly contrasts the traditional thinking of today’ corporation where they think of employees as a disposable resource instead of a unique human being created by God.
Guinness’s investment in their employees were impressive. If you had worked for Guinness in 1928, a year before the Great Depression, you would have had 24-hour medical care, 24-hour dental care and an on-site massage therapy. In addition to this, your funeral expenses were paid by the company as well as your pension all paid with no contributions needed to be made. Your education as well as your children and wife were all paid for. The company had libraries, reading rooms, athletic facilities and so on. Now, think again. This was 1928…not 2012.
The Guinness family was, by all accounts, a godly family and one the Lord used greatly in His service. What most fascinates me is not the novelty of utilizing beer as an instrument to spread the Good News but how a Christian businessman incorporated his faith so holistically in his business. Today, the world needs more people like Arthur Guinness.
Let me conclude this blog post with a departing question to you. What are you doing now that is giving glory to God. What tool are you using to maximize your God-given talent to advance the Christian mission? 
If this blog post piqued your interest, I highly recommended Stephen Mansfield’s book The Search for God and Guinness. It is a fantastic read even for those who don’t enjoy beer like myself. Mansfield ends the book, capturing the essence of the Guinness Way:
  1. Discern the ways of God for life and business.
  2. Think in terms of generations yet to come.
  3. Whatever else you do, do at least one thing very well.
  4. Master the facts before you act.
  5. Invest in those you would have invest in you.
  6.  
@@@@

The Philanthropists: Arthur Guinness

November 24, 2013

Arthur Guinness (1724 or 1725 – 1803) was the visionary, entrepreneur, and Christian philanthropist who founded the Guinness brewery business. Born into an Irish Protestant family, Guinness received £100 from his godfather Arthur Price, the Archbishop of Cashel, in the Church of Ireland. When he was about 30 years old, Guinness invested this money in building a brewery near Dublin, the capital of Ireland. In 1761, Guinness married Olivia Whitmore in Dublin and amazingly they had 21 children.

Like many others during his day, Guinness had numerous family members who brewed their own beer (Arthur’s father had, and three of his sons did as well). Alcohol was a safer alternative to drinking the disease-infested, unfiltered water of the time. However, since so many drank to great excess, some people began to brew beer which had a much lower concentration of alcohol. Guinness was among them.

His Conversion
As noted earlier, the Guinness’s were Irish Protestants. Therefore, Arthur grew up going to church. His personal motto was Spes Mea in Deo, which means, “My hope is in God.” He was a devout Christian who loved Jesus and shared his care for the weak and poor. This love led him to help those who were addicted to strong drinks like whiskey and gin, and to offer a healthier and safer alternative in beer.
Guinness had the opportunity to hear John Wesley preach at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. The revivalist made a strong impression on him. In response, he lived Wesley’s message: “Earn all you can. Save all you can. Give all you can. Your wealth is evidence of a calling from God, so use your abundance for the good of mankind.” God indeed gave him great wealth and he was faithful to honor God and love others with what he had received.

His Contributions
A significant part of Guinness’s giving was his genuine desire to help people by brewing beer because of its lower concentration of alcohol compared to many other drinks (as we noted earlier). In other words, beer genuinely helped some people avoid the excesses of drunkenness. Similarly, because of Wesley’s influence and message, Guinness worked hard to start Sunday schools and, in fact, founded the ministry of Sunday schools in Ireland. He gave money to the poor, served on hospital boards, and sought to live a simple life despite being quite wealthy.

The legacy Guinness left is still felt today. In 2009, Guinness & Co. established the Arthur Guinness Fund (AGF), which offers people opportunities to help their communities. One of the main reasons his influence has lasted so long is that he invested a great deal of time and energy into his family. He taught his children the same values that he himself cherished and lived by. Thus, his children developed the Guinness Corporation into a strong, effective organization that is still widely known to this day. Much of the reason it has done so well is because the corporation has been very generous with its customers, with its own employees, and with those outside the organization. For example, during World War II, Guinness gave a bottle of their beer to every British soldier serving in the war. Through many other similar stories, Guinness sought the good of mankind and the praise of God.

Thursday, December 12, 2013

The Five Points of Reformed Baptist Churches

The Five Points of Reformed Baptist Churches

 
A brief out-line of our distinctive convictions

I REFORMATIONAL
A. Sola Scriptura  -  The Bible is the complete, closed and clear authority in all matters of faith.
B. Solus Christus  -  Our confidence is in Jesus Christ alone for salvation.
C. Sola Gratia  -  Grace secured redemption without reference to works.
D. Sola Fide  -  We are declared righteous by God through faith alone(1).
E. Soli Deo Gloria  -  Goal of creation and redemption is God‘s praise.

II CALVINISTIC
A. Total Depravity  -  The fall of Adam affected the totality of man’s person(2).
B. Unconditional Election  -  Election is not based on foreseen faith or works(3).
C. Limited Atonement  -  Redemption was accomplished by Christ for elect(4).
D. Irresistible Grace  -  Regeneration by the Holy Spirit is efficacious for elect.
E. Perseverance of the Saints  -  God will, by grace, complete what He began in regeneration of the elect.

III PURITAN
A. Godliness in Worship  -  Regulative Principle of Worship(5), the Lord’s Day as a Christian Sabbath.
B. Godliness in Preaching  -  Primacy of preaching. Both exposition and application emphasized.
C. Godliness in Instruction  -  Confessional and catholic. Publishing what we believe the Bible teaches(6).
D. Godliness in Family  -  Parents are to instruct (catechize) and discipline their children in the Lord.
E. Godliness in Behavior  -  Maintaining a good conscience before God and man.

IV COVENANTAL
A. Unity of the Bible  -  Many parts yet one message.
B. Christ-centered interpretation  -  Jesus’ person, work and kingdom is the theme of the Bible.
C. Law / Gospel distinction  -  Law(7) commands and condemns. Gospel saves(8).
D. One way of salvation  -  Christ has saved all the elect throughout all the ages.
E. Optimistic view of history  -  Jesus Christ is now King ruling over all. He will soon come again.

V BAPTIST
A. Biblical Church Practice  -  Ordinances for believers only(9). Church discipline lovingly exercised.
B. Biblical Church Freedom  -  The state is not to intrude into matters of conscience.
C. Biblical Church Government  -  Elders and deacons. The local congregation chooses its leaders(10).
D. Biblical Church Growth  -  Gospel proclamation to the world. Repentance and Faith demanded of all.
E. Biblical Church Ministry  -  Priesthood of all believers(11).

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

THOU SHALT NOT QUESTION MARK DRISCOLL ?

If the Top Men take over, who will ask the hard questions?

Posted by
The controversy surrounding Janet Mefferd's interview of Mark Driscoll is interesting for a variety of reasons.  There is one aspect of it which has yet to attract comment as far as I can tell.  That is the way it brings out another aspect of the celebrity culture which has so corrupted the young, restless and reformed movement.

My interest here is not who was right and who was wrong.  That will no doubt be fairly easy to establish as the claims which Janet Mefferd made should be empirically verifiable.    I would only comment that, in my own interactions with Janet Mefferd, I have always found her forthright but fair.  I am concerned in this post only with what the reactions to the interview tell us about the culture of celebrity in the subculture that is evangelicalism. 

I have tried a number of times to make the point that being a celebrity is not the same as being a public figure.   Anyone who acts in public is, to a greater or lesser degree, a public figure.  Celebrity brings with it such matters as a culture of false intimacy with complete strangers and a charismatic authority rooted in the person not in an institution.  Thus, influence is often predicated on personality, not on the intrinsic merits of arguments etc.

The Mefferd-Driscoll controversy points to another aspect of celebrity culture: celebrities are routinely allowed to behave in ways which would not be tolerated in ordinary mortals.  For example, being drunk on the job and hurling abuse at an employer would make one unemployable in the real world.  Not for Charlie Sheen. A conviction for rape would be enough to have you characterized as a monster in the real world who had forfeited the right to sympathetic media exposure.   Not for Mike Tyson or Roman Polanski (just ask that champion of women's rights, Whoopi Goldberg).   In short, normal rules do not apply to celebrities in the same way as they do to others. 

The same is true in the celebritydrome of the evangelical subculture.   Driscoll is a classic case in point. For example, he has claimed that God gives him explicit images of the sexual sins of other people.  He has embraced prosperity teacher and denier of the Trinity, T. D. Jakes, as a brother. He has written an explicit book on sex. Most recently, he engaged in a cringe-inducing publicity stunt unworthy of a spoiled teenager. For most of us, any one of these things would have ended in church discipline and (in the Jakes' case) removal from office.  Yet in all of this, the fan base and those with a vested interest in capitalizing on his success grant him free pass after free pass. 

So the fall-out from The Janet Mefferd Show has been interesting even as it has been entirely predictable.  The fan base and those with a vested interest in Driscoll's reputation rally around their hero while excoriating Janet Mefferd.   In so doing, they ironically demonstrate why shows such as Janet Mefferd's can be so very important: if the conservative evangelical world continues to be increasingly dominated by one or two huge media-style organizations, the conversation will be corralled and controlled, the hard questions will not be asked, and the leaders of such organizations and those over whom they choose to extend their patronage will not be held to account.

If, in your quest to promote yourself, you ask to appear on a particular show, you should be tough enough to take whatever that show throws at you with equanimity. The intricate and risky dance between celebrities and media is part of the game you have chosen to play, indeed a large factor in what has made you famous and influential.  Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not.  In such circumstances, you should also accept that Janet Mefferd's job is not to make you look good or to keep her comments within the accepted bounds of evangelical correctness as defined by you or by any other Top Man.  Her job as a radio journalist is to ask the hard questions and hold you, me or whomever she is addressing, to account.  

But you can still sleep easy at night knowing this important truth: blessed are the celebrities, for they will be rigorously held to a much lower standard of behaviour than the rest of us.  

Posted November 24, 2013 @ 3:24 PM by Carl Trueman

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Christian Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving-Brownscombe pilgrim puritan header indian
Eric Ayala:
As the Thanksgiving holiday comes again this year, we should remember the Thanksgiving meal that Christians celebrate all year long, the Eucharist. Apart from the theological prejudice that is heaped onto the term, Eucharist simply means “Thanks Giving.” We can see this aspect of the supper when Christ himself inaugurated his covenantal meal…

If all the Supper does is make us realize our sin and leave us in a self absorbed state because of the week’s failures, then we have missed a vital aspect of its proper observance.  When we properly understand the Lord’s Supper we should be moved to thanksgiving.

Unfortunately, when the issue of the Lord’s Supper comes up, the response many times is, “How often do we have to do it?” rather than, “Wow, we get to do it!”

Saturday, November 30, 2013

My 3rd sermon - Psalm 51


Intro

Good morning, Calvary.  I hope you had a good Thanksgiving.  My family and I went down to Joplin for the day to see my parents, who will be listening to this via podcast, so “Hello, Mom and Dad.”  Last week, as a church, you voted me in as your newest elder and I just wanted to say thank you and I’ll try to live up to that responsibility.  

We have a lot to be thankful for and 1 thing in particular we can be thankful for is a small Latin phrase Vox Scriptura Vox Dei.  Vox is a Latin word meaning voice so Vox Scriputra Vox Dei means the voice of scripture is the voice of God.  This means we don’t need to send some spiritual mystic on TV a $1000 seed offering to “hear a special word from God” and if we want to hear from God all we need to do is open our Bible and read it out loud. 

So let me say a quick prayer over us and I will read Psalm 51 so you can hear God’s sermon first and then we’ll double back and I’ll just flesh out a few points for you.

Long prayer – Let’s pray.  Father we thank you for this Lord’s Day and we thank you for our pastors: Brian and Jay.  We pray that they are having a good holiday off from work to recoup with their families and we thank you for the faithful members of this congregation and for this ancient word to us from the past, regarding your servant David.  Here we see a plea that the people of God stray not far away from the basic principles of this passage – faith in the Gospel – that you and only you can ultimately forgive sin; that we, your people, must daily recognize our own sin in repentance; that we must resolve ourselves with our need for you to act sovereignly; that we who have been forgiven, we who have feasted on the forgiveness of sins…we must act and we must be the ones now who point others back to the banquet table of Christ.  Like David, may our hearts be broken and burdened with our own sin, may we plead with you for forgiveness and for the blessing of the church and for the growth and maturity of the people of God.  This we pray…and all of God’s people said?  Amen.  Read passage!!
Historical Background

If you don’t know much about the Psalms there are about 150, David wrote about 70-75, of those about 18 are autobiographical and of those this one is by far the best.  As a matter of fact I think this may be one of the best chapters in the entire bible.  Psalm 51 is a gospel/repentance song, a plea for mercy and grace written by the great Jewish King – David after his adultery with Bathsheba and his murder of her husband, Uriah the Hittite.  About a year after these dark events the Lord sent a prophet, a pastor, Nathan to David’s court with a parable about an unjust rich man who took a poorer man’s one and only lamb…at the end of the story David indignant cries, “Unjust!  Let this man face judgment!”  And it was here that Nathan explained to David that he was the selfish rich man greedily taking what didn’t belong to him…and while God promised to ultimately forgive David of his sin, he also directly told David how he would suffer in this life because of his crimes.

If you’ve got your notes I’ve tried to break down the Psalm into 5 parts based off their theme and their paragraphs according to the ESV or as I like to call it the Elect Standard Version. These 5 sections are: Faith in the Gospel, True Repentance, Reliance on God, Motivation for Service and a Petition for God’s People.

Section I – Faith in the Gospel vs. 1-2
            A – Mercy vs. Merit
I love that David starts the Psalm right off with the Gospel.  He trusts that as bad as his sin was God in his mercy would forgive and cleanse him from all his faults.  I know we say we understand that Salvation is God’s work done for us but from a very young age we are ingrained with the Merit system.

From what I remember of Pre-school and Kindergarten the teacher had a large chart with spaces and kids names and the days of the week.  Each week students could earn gold stars by listening and behaving well and whatever and at the end of the week the students with the most gold stars would earn some reward.  Like this, maybe you have studied hard so you earned that A on a paper, or you worked hard so you earned that raise or promotion.  But that’s not mercy or grace.  Grace would be you were the worst behaved kid in school so here is your ice cream, or you were the laziest student in class so here is your A.  Maybe you had the most customer complaints in the entire region, so welcome to management and a corner office.

Grace is undeserved favor and sometimes its important to be reminded of that, as it keeps us humble and not thinking too highly of ourselves.

            B – Compounding sin
One of our girls recently got caught in a lie and to squirm out of it she had to keep coming up with more and more lies to cover it up.  For those who cannot or will not repent there is often compounding sin.  As David lusts for Bathsheba, then that leads to adultery, then to lies and deceit to cove it up, then ultimately to the murder of Uriah when the lies and deceit don’t work.  See this is the way of unrepentant sin; it often makes the sinner’s heart more and more callous making it less and less likely that you will ever repent and more and more likely that you will sin again in the future.  That is why a passage like psalm 51 can be such a powerful engine for real change in a believer’s life.  

Section II – True Repentance vs. 3-6
            A – For the believer
Martin Luther famously said in the 1st of his 95 thesis that when our Lord and Master said, “Repent.” He meant that the entire life of the believer should be 1 of repentance.

We see this too in the mind of David, as he laments over his sin he uses a particular word in 2 different verses wash which in Hebrew literally means “to wash clothes,” David is poetically describing himself and his sin as dirty garments that need cleaned by God.  This illusion is used several other times in Scripture.  Once in Revelation chapter 7 when the Apostle John is describing the Saints of God  - he calls them those whose robes have been washed in the blood of the Lamb or in Zechariah chapter 3 when Joshua the high priest is in a vision before the throne of heaven and his dirty clothes are replaced by God and there those dirty clothes are explained as all of Joshua’s iniquities, his faults, and failures.  Friends, if you are someone with a sensitive heart, unsure of God’s mercy, then this is a great psalm for you.  God’s gift of whiter than white garments, purer than pure vestments and more righteous than righteous forgiveness is greater than your sin.  That is why you can come to the Lord in repentance not because you are great in yourself but because His mercy for you is greater than your wickedness.

            B – For the church
Tying this back to our study of the book of Ephesians, Paul in Acts 20 is about to die, he knows this and he has 1 last chance to tell the Christians of Ephesus what they’ll need to know to live the Christian life without his guidance and he only gives them 3 things: live humbly, repent to God and trust in the work of Christ.  I fear that the biblical emphases on repentance, which requires time and self-reflection are being pushed to the wayside today…either because of the busyness of our lives or because we frankly don’t think our sin is all that bad.  And if that is the case I would suggest re-reading the 10 commandments from Exodus 20 or the sin list in Romans 1.  And see how gossiping is still listed alongside homosexuality and honoring your parents and not coveting your neighbors stuff is alongside murder and adultery, as grave crimes against God.  This may remind us of the seriousness of our errors.  But for those of us believers that strive for goodness only to fail and begin again we are taught in these passages that Divine Grace covers our faults the way a cloak covers a wayward traveler.

One of my favorite ancient writers was a man called Augustine of Hippo.  Augustine said if you recognize yourself being too critical of others then it’s because you are in need of repentance of your own sins.  Listen to this quote, “Men are hopeless creatures – the less they concentrate on their own sin, the more interested they become in the sins of others.  They seek to criticize, not correct.  Unable to excuse themselves, they are ready to accuse others.”

Section III – Relying on God vs. 7-12
            A – God must be at work
David gives us another vivid picture – that of being purged with hyssop, which is an illustration from Leviticus about the cleansing of leapers.  See in God’s eyes our sin is an incurable disease with 1 of 2 outcomes either eternal death or new life “in Christ.”  In repentance, David shows us his longing to be spiritually cleansed from moral defilement.  David’s example is that a believer should desire renewal back into holiness as much as the joy of their salvation.  David in recognition of his own sin does not give us weak vows toward moral improvement, excuses or blame-shifting, he doesn’t even see his own ability to fix himself but begs the Sovereign God to do it to him and for him.  Create in me a pure heart, oh God!  Grant me faith, gift me repentance and make me willing to fulfill your purposes. 

            B – the Dependent Will
Very popular in American theology is a term called Free will; Libertarian Free will has to do with a separation or independence from God.  As an example, we are free from the rules and regulations put forth by the Queen of England and their Prime Minister because we are not British; we’re free from that. 

Conversely, let me give you a few points from the NT regarding our dependent will.   We are dependent on God for being drawn to God (John 6), conversion (John 3), faith (Eph. 2), repentance (2nd Timothy 2), the opening of our hearts, understanding of Scripture, the fruits of the Spirit, and on and on and on.  David recognizes his need for God to be the one at work in his life; if you cleanse me I’ll be clean.  It’s not a work he can do on his own, and that’s what motivates and impassions his prayer life before God.  This is why we can pray to God that he will act in saving our friends and family, many who do not even will to be his children yet, who do not even recognize their need for a Savior.  David is our example for Man’s utter reliance on God in the forgiveness of sins, correction and guidance for life.

Section IV – Motivation for Service vs. 13-16
We have already seen earlier that the Gospel is about God’s work in saving sinners and not due to our merit in earning that Salvation.  Yet here we also see a 2nd universal truth for believers that those to have been forgiven, long for others to be forgiven as well.  This has been the biblical motivation for service and missions since the days of David.  In this section we see that David in recognition of God’s mercy, longs to preach, teach, praise and worship and lead others in these acts as well.  If you have no concern for the growth of the church or the salvation of sinners then perhaps you should look to yourself for sin in need of repentance.

Again from my friend Martin Luther, “The Christian’s life consists of nothing but grace.  To lose oneself in the depth of grace is our truest theology.  God loves those who acknowledge their lostness; he purifies them and sets them free.  Anyone who came to God in a lost condition brought him the most appropriate offering.  True theology is turning from your lost condition to trust in God.”  And thus true service is pointing others to that place of forgiveness as well.

Section V – A Petition for God’s People vs. 18-19
Like David we are called to prayer, begging for blessings for the church “Zion,” and for God’s people “Jerusalem.”  What this section reminds us is that prayer should not be taken for granted – prayer is the best weapon a Christian has.  God is like the A-bomb in the Christian’s arsenal, this is what we should be doing, praying for God’s gospel to go forth, for its gaining ground, and for God’s people.  The most underappreciated but most powerful work in the church today is prayer, unrelenting; never quitting prayer that God will move in his church and among his people.
Conclusion:
Before we close let me just say that behind this chapter, behind the forgiveness of sin, behind repentance, behind a sovereign Savior looms large the cross of Christ.  God gave David the most painful of object lessons ever.  This confrontation between the prophet Nathan and David happens in 2nd Samuel 12 and in that meeting God teaches David something of substitution.  God tells David that his sin will cost the life of his and Bathsheba’s 1 and only son, their beloved son; the son of the king.  In this we see the foreshadowing of our substitute Jesus Christ, the son of the True King, who died in the place of our sin, to bring us to repentance and faith and forgiveness.  Let us be thankful for that this holiday season.

Let’s pray:
You must do this God.  We, your people, are dependent on you for the salvation of sinners, for the advancement of your Gospel, for faithfulness, keep us willing to serve, we pray for this and we pray like Charles Spurgeon did when contemplating this chapter– “Oh let us seek after this brokenness of heart, for however excellent our words may be, yet if the heart is not conscious of the blackness and hell-deservingness of sin, we cannot expect to find mercy with the Judge of all the earth.  If the Lord wills to break your heart today, consent to have it broken; asking that he may sanctify that brokenness of spirit to bring you in earnest to a Savior, that you may yet be numbered with the righteous’d ones.” We are thankful for you Lord, bless your people and bless your church. Amen.

Monday, November 25, 2013

The best man, on the best subject.

Martin Luther on the Gospel

Luther Theses

“Thus the sum and substance of all doctrine is this, that we are not justified by any works, but that faith in Christ saves.  This text (John 6:32)  is a veritable thunderclap that impels you to exclaim: what can my life and my good works help me?  Moses does not aid me.  Moses is only a schoolmaster in this field; he instructs me about an external mode of divine service and the strictest outward decency.  The works of Moses do not give life and salvation.  Here we are informed of another and better bread, called God’s bread, which comes from heaven and is not baked on earth.  It is granted by the Holy Spirit.  It confers everlasting life, a life not merited and earned, a gift from heaven.

Thus you see two kinds of bread here.  The one is not earned, not acquired through a self-chosen, self-devised mode of life, but is an outright gift of bread, food and life.  The other is the bread that man wants to merit through good works and the observance of Moses’ Law.  But whoever refuses to accept life by grace and without merit will never obtain it.  The Father gives it; therefore it is not merited.  It is mine by sheer mercy and grace.  Thus my merit is toppled over and knocked down to the ground.”

(Martin Luther, Sermons on the Gospel of John, Chapters 6-8 (translated by M.H. Bertram), Concordia Publishing House, St. Louis, 1959, p. 36).

Monday, November 18, 2013

18,000+ pages

WOO HOO !!!

18,000 + pageviews !!!


Here we stand - Jason Allen Pres. Midwestern Seminary


  • Here We Stand: Midwestern Seminary & Same-Sex Marriage
Posted on: Monday, November 4th, 2013

The 19th century Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck observed, “Political genius is hearing the distant hoof beat of the horse of history and then leaping to catch the passing horseman by the coattails.”[i] When it comes to issues of human sexuality and marriage, skilled politicians are not the only ones listening to the hoof beats of history and lunging for the horseman’s coattails. Religious leaders are too.

As cultural momentum toward full acceptance and normalization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage intensifies so will the pressure on Christian organizations to adopt accommodating policies.  Indeed, venerable Christian and Baptist entities have amended, or are contemplating amending, their guidelines toward same-sex marriage and alternative lifestyles.

Many self-identified Christian entities yet to officially sanction homosexuality and same-sex marriage operate under their own version of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Mum” is their word. They seek intentional ambiguity on issues of gender, sexuality, and marriage to avoid offending one or more of their constituencies. Such middle ground is eroding by the day, as it well should. Every institution’s constituency has the right to know where it stands, and every school—and every school leader—has a moral obligation to make its stance known.

Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary has long since settled its view of marriage and human sexuality, but it is appropriate to state and restate our convictions, especially in light of the swift and dramatic cultural shifts now taking place. Midwestern Seminary is not polling students, conducting market surveys, or engaging focus groups among likely supporters to determine our position. Nor will we. Midwestern Seminary stands unapologetically for a biblical sexual ethic that affirms marriage as between one man and one woman for life and counts as sin all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage. Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, we have so planted our standard.

Biblical Conviction
Midwestern Seminary is committed to the Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, and authoritative Word. We confess with the Reformers, vox Scriptura vox dei—the voice of Scripture is the voice of God. The Bible speaks clearly concerning marriage and human sexuality, and we joyfully submit to its declarations. As part of his created order, God established marriage as between one man and one woman.[ii] This standard remains consistent throughout Scripture, confirmed by Jesus[iii] and reconfirmed by the apostles.[iv]

Moreover, the Bible prohibits all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts. The Bible’s statements about human sexuality and marriage are clear—sexual activity is reserved exclusively for one man and one woman, bound together before God in a covenantal, conjugal marriage.

Denominational Faithfulness
Midwestern Seminary is an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. We abide under their ownership and governance and are legally and morally obligated to keep trust with the Southern Baptist churches that own us.

Southern Baptists have clearly and repeatedly stood with Scripture and the broader Christian tradition on human sexuality and marriage. The vast majority of Southern Baptists classify as sin all forms of sexual immorality and alternative lifestyles. Moreover, the SBC will not seat messengers from churches that “act to affirm, approve, or endorse homosexual behavior.”[v]

As Midwestern Seminary stands for sexual purity and conjugal marriage, we do not stand alone. We are in lockstep with the denomination that owns us.

Confessional Integrity
As a seminary of the SBC, Midwestern Seminary is bound confessionally to the Baptist Faith & Message, 2000. Our confessional commitment is nonnegotiable, forthright, and unshakeable. We hold our doctrinal commitments with full integrity and keep them in both the letter and spirit of their expectation.

The BF&M 2000 defines marriage as “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”[vi] The Midwestern Seminary faculty happily teaches in accordance with and not contrary to the BF&M 2000 and will continue to do so, undaunted, regardless of cultural challenge or societal scorn.

Societal Witness
Finally, Jesus’ command to “love your neighbor as yourself” necessitates that we “speak the truth, in love” to all peoples on all things, including issues of marriage and sexuality. We understand Scripture establishes and celebrates conjugal, covenantal marriage as the only sexual relationship that glorifies God and facilitates human flourishing.

Furthermore, Scripture labels all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts, as sin. For millennia, these acts have been proscribed by the Christian tradition, and love for neighbor compels us to point out these acts as sin and point our neighbors to the gospel of Christ, which redeems us from all sin.

Conclusion
Persistent agitation to legalize same-sex marriage will not abate, and the national acceptance of same-sex marriage likely will accelerate. We are not mere onlookers, listening for history’s hoof beats and lunging for the passing horseman’s coattails. Neither are we crusty, staid traditionalists, channeling William F. Buckley, standing athwart history yelling “Stop!”

Midwestern Seminary is called neither to ride the cultural current nor to stop it but to transcend it altogether. Our call is to speak consistently the settled truth of Scripture with confidence and grace, and to point all peoples to the message of Jesus, which saves, transforms, and renews. We do so not because the sexually immoral are worse than us, but because they are precisely like us—in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, Midwestern Seminary graciously—yet confidently—declares that God intended marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a man and a woman, and that all sexual activity outside of that marital covenant is sin. To this truth, our consciences are bound. Here we stand.


[i] Cited by Isaiah Berlin, “Winston Churchill in 1940” in Personal Impressions (exp. ed.; ed. Henry Hardy; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 15.
[ii] See Genesis 1:28–31; 2:4–25.
[iii] See Matthew 5:31–32; 18:2–5; 19:3–9; Mark 10:6–12.
[iv] See Romans 1:18–32; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16; Ephesians 5:21–33; 6:1–4; Colossians 3:18–21; 1 Timothy 5:8,14; 2 Timothy 1:3–5; Titus 2:3–5; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Peter 3:1–7.
[v] Southern Baptist Convention Constitution, Article III.1. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/legal/constitution.asp.
[vi] Baptist Faith and Message, 2000, Article XVIII: The Family. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp.
- See more at: http://jasonkallen.com/2013/11/here-we-stand-midwestern-seminary-same-sex-marriage/#sthash.UkBdmpLG.dpuf
  • Here We Stand: Midwestern Seminary & Same-Sex Marriage

    The 19th century Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck observed, “Political genius is hearing the distant hoof beat of the horse of history and then leaping to catch the passing horseman by the coattails.”[i] When it comes to issues of human sexuality and marriage, skilled politicians are not the only ones listening to the hoof beats of history and lunging for the horseman’s coattails. Religious leaders are too.
    As cultural momentum toward full acceptance and normalization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage intensifies so will the pressure on Christian organizations to adopt accommodating policies.  Indeed, venerable Christian and Baptist entities have amended, or are contemplating amending, their guidelines toward same-sex marriage and alternative lifestyles.
    Many self-identified Christian entities yet to officially sanction homosexuality and same-sex marriage operate under their own version of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Mum” is their word. They seek intentional ambiguity on issues of gender, sexuality, and marriage to avoid offending one or more of their constituencies. Such middle ground is eroding by the day, as it well should. Every institution’s constituency has the right to know where it stands, and every school—and every school leader—has a moral obligation to make its stance known.
    Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary has long since settled its view of marriage and human sexuality, but it is appropriate to state and restate our convictions, especially in light of the swift and dramatic cultural shifts now taking place. Midwestern Seminary is not polling students, conducting market surveys, or engaging focus groups among likely supporters to determine our position. Nor will we. Midwestern Seminary stands unapologetically for a biblical sexual ethic that affirms marriage as between one man and one woman for life and counts as sin all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage. Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, we have so planted our standard.

    Biblical Conviction

    Midwestern Seminary is committed to the Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, and authoritative Word. We confess with the Reformers, vox Scriptura vox dei—the voice of Scripture is the voice of God. The Bible speaks clearly concerning marriage and human sexuality, and we joyfully submit to its declarations. As part of his created order, God established marriage as between one man and one woman.[ii] This standard remains consistent throughout Scripture, confirmed by Jesus[iii] and reconfirmed by the apostles.[iv]
    Moreover, the Bible prohibits all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts. The Bible’s statements about human sexuality and marriage are clear—sexual activity is reserved exclusively for one man and one woman, bound together before God in a covenantal, conjugal marriage.

    Denominational Faithfulness

    Midwestern Seminary is an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. We abide under their ownership and governance and are legally and morally obligated to keep trust with the Southern Baptist churches that own us.
    Southern Baptists have clearly and repeatedly stood with Scripture and the broader Christian tradition on human sexuality and marriage. The vast majority of Southern Baptists classify as sin all forms of sexual immorality and alternative lifestyles. Moreover, the SBC will not seat messengers from churches that “act to affirm, approve, or endorse homosexual behavior.”[v]
    As Midwestern Seminary stands for sexual purity and conjugal marriage, we do not stand alone. We are in lockstep with the denomination that owns us.

    Confessional Integrity

    As a seminary of the SBC, Midwestern Seminary is bound confessionally to the Baptist Faith & Message, 2000. Our confessional commitment is nonnegotiable, forthright, and unshakeable. We hold our doctrinal commitments with full integrity and keep them in both the letter and spirit of their expectation.
    The BF&M 2000 defines marriage as “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”[vi] The Midwestern Seminary faculty happily teaches in accordance with and not contrary to the BF&M 2000 and will continue to do so, undaunted, regardless of cultural challenge or societal scorn.

    Societal Witness

    Finally, Jesus’ command to “love your neighbor as yourself” necessitates that we “speak the truth, in love” to all peoples on all things, including issues of marriage and sexuality. We understand Scripture establishes and celebrates conjugal, covenantal marriage as the only sexual relationship that glorifies God and facilitates human flourishing.
    Furthermore, Scripture labels all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts, as sin. For millennia, these acts have been proscribed by the Christian tradition, and love for neighbor compels us to point out these acts as sin and point our neighbors to the gospel of Christ, which redeems us from all sin.

    Conclusion

    Persistent agitation to legalize same-sex marriage will not abate, and the national acceptance of same-sex marriage likely will accelerate. We are not mere onlookers, listening for history’s hoof beats and lunging for the passing horseman’s coattails. Neither are we crusty, staid traditionalists, channeling William F. Buckley, standing athwart history yelling “Stop!”
    Midwestern Seminary is called neither to ride the cultural current nor to stop it but to transcend it altogether. Our call is to speak consistently the settled truth of Scripture with confidence and grace, and to point all peoples to the message of Jesus, which saves, transforms, and renews. We do so not because the sexually immoral are worse than us, but because they are precisely like us—in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
    Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, Midwestern Seminary graciously—yet confidently—declares that God intended marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a man and a woman, and that all sexual activity outside of that marital covenant is sin. To this truth, our consciences are bound. Here we stand.

    [i] Cited by Isaiah Berlin, “Winston Churchill in 1940” in Personal Impressions (exp. ed.; ed. Henry Hardy; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 15.
    [ii] See Genesis 1:28–31; 2:4–25.
    [iii] See Matthew 5:31–32; 18:2–5; 19:3–9; Mark 10:6–12.
    [iv] See Romans 1:18–32; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16; Ephesians 5:21–33; 6:1–4; Colossians 3:18–21; 1 Timothy 5:8,14; 2 Timothy 1:3–5; Titus 2:3–5; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Peter 3:1–7.
    [v] Southern Baptist Convention Constitution, Article III.1. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/legal/constitution.asp.
    [vi] Baptist Faith and Message, 2000, Article XVIII: The Family. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp.
- See more at: http://jasonkallen.com/2013/11/here-we-stand-midwestern-seminary-same-sex-marriage/#sthash.UkBdmpLG.dpuf
  • Here We Stand: Midwestern Seminary & Same-Sex Marriage

    The 19th century Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck observed, “Political genius is hearing the distant hoof beat of the horse of history and then leaping to catch the passing horseman by the coattails.”[i] When it comes to issues of human sexuality and marriage, skilled politicians are not the only ones listening to the hoof beats of history and lunging for the horseman’s coattails. Religious leaders are too.
    As cultural momentum toward full acceptance and normalization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage intensifies so will the pressure on Christian organizations to adopt accommodating policies.  Indeed, venerable Christian and Baptist entities have amended, or are contemplating amending, their guidelines toward same-sex marriage and alternative lifestyles.
    Many self-identified Christian entities yet to officially sanction homosexuality and same-sex marriage operate under their own version of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Mum” is their word. They seek intentional ambiguity on issues of gender, sexuality, and marriage to avoid offending one or more of their constituencies. Such middle ground is eroding by the day, as it well should. Every institution’s constituency has the right to know where it stands, and every school—and every school leader—has a moral obligation to make its stance known.
    Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary has long since settled its view of marriage and human sexuality, but it is appropriate to state and restate our convictions, especially in light of the swift and dramatic cultural shifts now taking place. Midwestern Seminary is not polling students, conducting market surveys, or engaging focus groups among likely supporters to determine our position. Nor will we. Midwestern Seminary stands unapologetically for a biblical sexual ethic that affirms marriage as between one man and one woman for life and counts as sin all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage. Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, we have so planted our standard.

    Biblical Conviction

    Midwestern Seminary is committed to the Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, and authoritative Word. We confess with the Reformers, vox Scriptura vox dei—the voice of Scripture is the voice of God. The Bible speaks clearly concerning marriage and human sexuality, and we joyfully submit to its declarations. As part of his created order, God established marriage as between one man and one woman.[ii] This standard remains consistent throughout Scripture, confirmed by Jesus[iii] and reconfirmed by the apostles.[iv]
    Moreover, the Bible prohibits all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts. The Bible’s statements about human sexuality and marriage are clear—sexual activity is reserved exclusively for one man and one woman, bound together before God in a covenantal, conjugal marriage.

    Denominational Faithfulness

    Midwestern Seminary is an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. We abide under their ownership and governance and are legally and morally obligated to keep trust with the Southern Baptist churches that own us.
    Southern Baptists have clearly and repeatedly stood with Scripture and the broader Christian tradition on human sexuality and marriage. The vast majority of Southern Baptists classify as sin all forms of sexual immorality and alternative lifestyles. Moreover, the SBC will not seat messengers from churches that “act to affirm, approve, or endorse homosexual behavior.”[v]
    As Midwestern Seminary stands for sexual purity and conjugal marriage, we do not stand alone. We are in lockstep with the denomination that owns us.

    Confessional Integrity

    As a seminary of the SBC, Midwestern Seminary is bound confessionally to the Baptist Faith & Message, 2000. Our confessional commitment is nonnegotiable, forthright, and unshakeable. We hold our doctrinal commitments with full integrity and keep them in both the letter and spirit of their expectation.
    The BF&M 2000 defines marriage as “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”[vi] The Midwestern Seminary faculty happily teaches in accordance with and not contrary to the BF&M 2000 and will continue to do so, undaunted, regardless of cultural challenge or societal scorn.

    Societal Witness

    Finally, Jesus’ command to “love your neighbor as yourself” necessitates that we “speak the truth, in love” to all peoples on all things, including issues of marriage and sexuality. We understand Scripture establishes and celebrates conjugal, covenantal marriage as the only sexual relationship that glorifies God and facilitates human flourishing.
    Furthermore, Scripture labels all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts, as sin. For millennia, these acts have been proscribed by the Christian tradition, and love for neighbor compels us to point out these acts as sin and point our neighbors to the gospel of Christ, which redeems us from all sin.

    Conclusion

    Persistent agitation to legalize same-sex marriage will not abate, and the national acceptance of same-sex marriage likely will accelerate. We are not mere onlookers, listening for history’s hoof beats and lunging for the passing horseman’s coattails. Neither are we crusty, staid traditionalists, channeling William F. Buckley, standing athwart history yelling “Stop!”
    Midwestern Seminary is called neither to ride the cultural current nor to stop it but to transcend it altogether. Our call is to speak consistently the settled truth of Scripture with confidence and grace, and to point all peoples to the message of Jesus, which saves, transforms, and renews. We do so not because the sexually immoral are worse than us, but because they are precisely like us—in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
    Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, Midwestern Seminary graciously—yet confidently—declares that God intended marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a man and a woman, and that all sexual activity outside of that marital covenant is sin. To this truth, our consciences are bound. Here we stand.

    [i] Cited by Isaiah Berlin, “Winston Churchill in 1940” in Personal Impressions (exp. ed.; ed. Henry Hardy; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 15.
    [ii] See Genesis 1:28–31; 2:4–25.
    [iii] See Matthew 5:31–32; 18:2–5; 19:3–9; Mark 10:6–12.
    [iv] See Romans 1:18–32; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16; Ephesians 5:21–33; 6:1–4; Colossians 3:18–21; 1 Timothy 5:8,14; 2 Timothy 1:3–5; Titus 2:3–5; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Peter 3:1–7.
    [v] Southern Baptist Convention Constitution, Article III.1. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/legal/constitution.asp.
    [vi] Baptist Faith and Message, 2000, Article XVIII: The Family. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp.
- See more at: http://jasonkallen.com/2013/11/here-we-stand-midwestern-seminary-same-sex-marriage/#sthash.UkBdmpLG.dpuf
  • Here We Stand: Midwestern Seminary & Same-Sex Marriage

    The 19th century Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck observed, “Political genius is hearing the distant hoof beat of the horse of history and then leaping to catch the passing horseman by the coattails.”[i] When it comes to issues of human sexuality and marriage, skilled politicians are not the only ones listening to the hoof beats of history and lunging for the horseman’s coattails. Religious leaders are too.
    As cultural momentum toward full acceptance and normalization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage intensifies so will the pressure on Christian organizations to adopt accommodating policies.  Indeed, venerable Christian and Baptist entities have amended, or are contemplating amending, their guidelines toward same-sex marriage and alternative lifestyles.
    Many self-identified Christian entities yet to officially sanction homosexuality and same-sex marriage operate under their own version of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Mum” is their word. They seek intentional ambiguity on issues of gender, sexuality, and marriage to avoid offending one or more of their constituencies. Such middle ground is eroding by the day, as it well should. Every institution’s constituency has the right to know where it stands, and every school—and every school leader—has a moral obligation to make its stance known.
    Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary has long since settled its view of marriage and human sexuality, but it is appropriate to state and restate our convictions, especially in light of the swift and dramatic cultural shifts now taking place. Midwestern Seminary is not polling students, conducting market surveys, or engaging focus groups among likely supporters to determine our position. Nor will we. Midwestern Seminary stands unapologetically for a biblical sexual ethic that affirms marriage as between one man and one woman for life and counts as sin all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage. Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, we have so planted our standard.

    Biblical Conviction

    Midwestern Seminary is committed to the Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, and authoritative Word. We confess with the Reformers, vox Scriptura vox dei—the voice of Scripture is the voice of God. The Bible speaks clearly concerning marriage and human sexuality, and we joyfully submit to its declarations. As part of his created order, God established marriage as between one man and one woman.[ii] This standard remains consistent throughout Scripture, confirmed by Jesus[iii] and reconfirmed by the apostles.[iv]
    Moreover, the Bible prohibits all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts. The Bible’s statements about human sexuality and marriage are clear—sexual activity is reserved exclusively for one man and one woman, bound together before God in a covenantal, conjugal marriage.

    Denominational Faithfulness

    Midwestern Seminary is an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. We abide under their ownership and governance and are legally and morally obligated to keep trust with the Southern Baptist churches that own us.
    Southern Baptists have clearly and repeatedly stood with Scripture and the broader Christian tradition on human sexuality and marriage. The vast majority of Southern Baptists classify as sin all forms of sexual immorality and alternative lifestyles. Moreover, the SBC will not seat messengers from churches that “act to affirm, approve, or endorse homosexual behavior.”[v]
    As Midwestern Seminary stands for sexual purity and conjugal marriage, we do not stand alone. We are in lockstep with the denomination that owns us.

    Confessional Integrity

    As a seminary of the SBC, Midwestern Seminary is bound confessionally to the Baptist Faith & Message, 2000. Our confessional commitment is nonnegotiable, forthright, and unshakeable. We hold our doctrinal commitments with full integrity and keep them in both the letter and spirit of their expectation.
    The BF&M 2000 defines marriage as “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”[vi] The Midwestern Seminary faculty happily teaches in accordance with and not contrary to the BF&M 2000 and will continue to do so, undaunted, regardless of cultural challenge or societal scorn.

    Societal Witness

    Finally, Jesus’ command to “love your neighbor as yourself” necessitates that we “speak the truth, in love” to all peoples on all things, including issues of marriage and sexuality. We understand Scripture establishes and celebrates conjugal, covenantal marriage as the only sexual relationship that glorifies God and facilitates human flourishing.
    Furthermore, Scripture labels all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts, as sin. For millennia, these acts have been proscribed by the Christian tradition, and love for neighbor compels us to point out these acts as sin and point our neighbors to the gospel of Christ, which redeems us from all sin.

    Conclusion

    Persistent agitation to legalize same-sex marriage will not abate, and the national acceptance of same-sex marriage likely will accelerate. We are not mere onlookers, listening for history’s hoof beats and lunging for the passing horseman’s coattails. Neither are we crusty, staid traditionalists, channeling William F. Buckley, standing athwart history yelling “Stop!”
    Midwestern Seminary is called neither to ride the cultural current nor to stop it but to transcend it altogether. Our call is to speak consistently the settled truth of Scripture with confidence and grace, and to point all peoples to the message of Jesus, which saves, transforms, and renews. We do so not because the sexually immoral are worse than us, but because they are precisely like us—in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
    Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, Midwestern Seminary graciously—yet confidently—declares that God intended marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a man and a woman, and that all sexual activity outside of that marital covenant is sin. To this truth, our consciences are bound. Here we stand.

    [i] Cited by Isaiah Berlin, “Winston Churchill in 1940” in Personal Impressions (exp. ed.; ed. Henry Hardy; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 15.
    [ii] See Genesis 1:28–31; 2:4–25.
    [iii] See Matthew 5:31–32; 18:2–5; 19:3–9; Mark 10:6–12.
    [iv] See Romans 1:18–32; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16; Ephesians 5:21–33; 6:1–4; Colossians 3:18–21; 1 Timothy 5:8,14; 2 Timothy 1:3–5; Titus 2:3–5; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Peter 3:1–7.
    [v] Southern Baptist Convention Constitution, Article III.1. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/legal/constitution.asp.
    [vi] Baptist Faith and Message, 2000, Article XVIII: The Family. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp.
- See more at: http://jasonkallen.com/2013/11/here-we-stand-midwestern-seminary-same-sex-marriage/#sthash.UkBdmpLG.dpuf
  • Here We Stand: Midwestern Seminary & Same-Sex Marriage

    The 19th century Prussian statesman Otto Von Bismarck observed, “Political genius is hearing the distant hoof beat of the horse of history and then leaping to catch the passing horseman by the coattails.”[i] When it comes to issues of human sexuality and marriage, skilled politicians are not the only ones listening to the hoof beats of history and lunging for the horseman’s coattails. Religious leaders are too.
    As cultural momentum toward full acceptance and normalization of homosexuality and same-sex marriage intensifies so will the pressure on Christian organizations to adopt accommodating policies.  Indeed, venerable Christian and Baptist entities have amended, or are contemplating amending, their guidelines toward same-sex marriage and alternative lifestyles.
    Many self-identified Christian entities yet to officially sanction homosexuality and same-sex marriage operate under their own version of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” “Mum” is their word. They seek intentional ambiguity on issues of gender, sexuality, and marriage to avoid offending one or more of their constituencies. Such middle ground is eroding by the day, as it well should. Every institution’s constituency has the right to know where it stands, and every school—and every school leader—has a moral obligation to make its stance known.
    Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary has long since settled its view of marriage and human sexuality, but it is appropriate to state and restate our convictions, especially in light of the swift and dramatic cultural shifts now taking place. Midwestern Seminary is not polling students, conducting market surveys, or engaging focus groups among likely supporters to determine our position. Nor will we. Midwestern Seminary stands unapologetically for a biblical sexual ethic that affirms marriage as between one man and one woman for life and counts as sin all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage. Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, we have so planted our standard.

    Biblical Conviction

    Midwestern Seminary is committed to the Bible as God’s inspired, inerrant, and authoritative Word. We confess with the Reformers, vox Scriptura vox dei—the voice of Scripture is the voice of God. The Bible speaks clearly concerning marriage and human sexuality, and we joyfully submit to its declarations. As part of his created order, God established marriage as between one man and one woman.[ii] This standard remains consistent throughout Scripture, confirmed by Jesus[iii] and reconfirmed by the apostles.[iv]
    Moreover, the Bible prohibits all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts. The Bible’s statements about human sexuality and marriage are clear—sexual activity is reserved exclusively for one man and one woman, bound together before God in a covenantal, conjugal marriage.

    Denominational Faithfulness

    Midwestern Seminary is an entity of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation’s largest Protestant denomination. We abide under their ownership and governance and are legally and morally obligated to keep trust with the Southern Baptist churches that own us.
    Southern Baptists have clearly and repeatedly stood with Scripture and the broader Christian tradition on human sexuality and marriage. The vast majority of Southern Baptists classify as sin all forms of sexual immorality and alternative lifestyles. Moreover, the SBC will not seat messengers from churches that “act to affirm, approve, or endorse homosexual behavior.”[v]
    As Midwestern Seminary stands for sexual purity and conjugal marriage, we do not stand alone. We are in lockstep with the denomination that owns us.

    Confessional Integrity

    As a seminary of the SBC, Midwestern Seminary is bound confessionally to the Baptist Faith & Message, 2000. Our confessional commitment is nonnegotiable, forthright, and unshakeable. We hold our doctrinal commitments with full integrity and keep them in both the letter and spirit of their expectation.
    The BF&M 2000 defines marriage as “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”[vi] The Midwestern Seminary faculty happily teaches in accordance with and not contrary to the BF&M 2000 and will continue to do so, undaunted, regardless of cultural challenge or societal scorn.

    Societal Witness

    Finally, Jesus’ command to “love your neighbor as yourself” necessitates that we “speak the truth, in love” to all peoples on all things, including issues of marriage and sexuality. We understand Scripture establishes and celebrates conjugal, covenantal marriage as the only sexual relationship that glorifies God and facilitates human flourishing.
    Furthermore, Scripture labels all sexual activity outside of covenantal marriage, including fornication, adultery, and homosexual acts, as sin. For millennia, these acts have been proscribed by the Christian tradition, and love for neighbor compels us to point out these acts as sin and point our neighbors to the gospel of Christ, which redeems us from all sin.

    Conclusion

    Persistent agitation to legalize same-sex marriage will not abate, and the national acceptance of same-sex marriage likely will accelerate. We are not mere onlookers, listening for history’s hoof beats and lunging for the passing horseman’s coattails. Neither are we crusty, staid traditionalists, channeling William F. Buckley, standing athwart history yelling “Stop!”
    Midwestern Seminary is called neither to ride the cultural current nor to stop it but to transcend it altogether. Our call is to speak consistently the settled truth of Scripture with confidence and grace, and to point all peoples to the message of Jesus, which saves, transforms, and renews. We do so not because the sexually immoral are worse than us, but because they are precisely like us—in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
    Driven by biblical conviction, denominational faithfulness, confessional integrity, and societal witness, Midwestern Seminary graciously—yet confidently—declares that God intended marriage to be a lifelong covenant between a man and a woman, and that all sexual activity outside of that marital covenant is sin. To this truth, our consciences are bound. Here we stand.

    [i] Cited by Isaiah Berlin, “Winston Churchill in 1940” in Personal Impressions (exp. ed.; ed. Henry Hardy; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 15.
    [ii] See Genesis 1:28–31; 2:4–25.
    [iii] See Matthew 5:31–32; 18:2–5; 19:3–9; Mark 10:6–12.
    [iv] See Romans 1:18–32; 1 Corinthians 7:1–16; Ephesians 5:21–33; 6:1–4; Colossians 3:18–21; 1 Timothy 5:8,14; 2 Timothy 1:3–5; Titus 2:3–5; Hebrews 13:4; 1 Peter 3:1–7.
    [v] Southern Baptist Convention Constitution, Article III.1. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/aboutus/legal/constitution.asp.
    [vi] Baptist Faith and Message, 2000, Article XVIII: The Family. Available online, http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp.
- See more at: http://jasonkallen.com/2013/11/here-we-stand-midwestern-seminary-same-sex-marriage/#sthash.UkBdmpLG.dpuf