Translate

Friday, November 18, 2016

Membership matters: Why Baptist?



Why Baptist & why SBC: (handout)

Tracking down the origins of the Baptist Church is an exercise in ancient church history. From the days of the apostles, there was one Church of Jesus Christ, with a single body of doctrine taught by the apostles. The various local churches preached repentance and confession of sins, along with baptism. Under the authority of the apostles themselves as to doctrine, each church was independently governed by the leaders God placed in them. There was no denominational hierarchy, or distinction of “us/them” within the various churches. When disputes over sound doctrine arose, the apostles declared God's teaching based on the words of the Lord and the Old Testament Scriptures. For at least 100 years, this model remained the standard for all churches. Thus, the characteristics that defined the earliest churches are the same that most Baptist churches identify with today.

To be Baptist is to be part of a church or denomination that, broadly speaking, holds to adult believer baptism (typically by full immersion) following a credible statement of faith as the only biblically acceptable way to administer the sacrament of baptism as commanded by our Lord in his Great Commission. This is the view called credo-baptism (“believer” baptism), which is held over against the view of paedo-baptism (“infant” baptism) that is commonly practiced by Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, Lutherans, Presbyterians, and many continental Reformed churches.

The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) is a denomination comprised of over 16 million members in over 42,000 churches in the United States. Individual church membership is typically a matter of accepting Jesus Christ as personal Savior and submitting to believer's baptism by immersion. The SBC is considered to be an evangelistic, mission-minded church with a generally conservative doctrine, which focuses on the fact that Jesus died for our sin, was buried, and then rose from the grave and ascended to heaven.

 In forming the denomination, Southern Baptists wanted to maintain the autonomy of the local churches while creating an alliance of churches working in friendly cooperation. The primary goal of the denomination is to identify with like-minded churches and pool resources to establish and advance the work of the Gospel. 

Overall, Southern Baptist churches are good, strong, biblically-based churches. As with any church denomination or association, though, there can be bad churches and/or bad pastors. Just as you should with any other church, sincerely ask God to lead you to the church of His choosing for you. Carefully examine the teachings and practices of a church before officially joining it.







Opener
1 Have them talk about themselves
2 Talk about myself:
            I am 1 of the elders here, I’m a true nerd – I’ve got interests in Science, History, Comics, Cinema & Literature – the whole 9 yards, S. (my wife) does the kid’s ministry here, I’m the father of 3 girls – ages 8, 6 & 3 so I could use your prayers in that area, I did not grow up Baptist, my childhood was more moral than Christian but I was a regular churchgoer.
How much do you know about Baptists Quiz?

So there are 4 Truths to determining “What is a genuine Baptist?”
I – a Baptist is a Christian
            What I mean by that is Baptists are historically orthodox.  Orthodox means “right” in doctrine or beliefs.  So basically Baptists fall in line with orthodox Christian beliefs.  Like what?  How we view God – a trinity.  How we view Christ – as both God & Man.  The sinfulness of Mankind & the need of Salvation & the Atonement of Christ, these are all orthodox beliefs.  Brian will say, “You cannot be a True Baptist & not be a Christian.”
II – a Baptist is an evangelical (or gospel-centered) Christian
            Last week, I believe you guys talked about the 5 Solas of the Reformation these very important truths were defended by Protestants against Catholics at that time.  These ideas were mainly about how sinful people can stand before a just judge & have him declare us innocent, which of course is because of Christ’s work done for us.
Can anyone remember a few of the Solas? Sola Fide, Gratia, Christus, Scriptura & Deo Gloria.
Any questions so far?
III – a Baptist is an evangelical, ecclesiastical (or churchman) Christian
            A Churchman is a older term that denotes a more ardent or active participator in the church.  This cab be a hard concept to grasp today when the ease of travel & technology have lost that sense of 100 years ago, in small town America, where everyone knows everyone else & we’re all involved in each other’s lives.  This is 1 of the reasons we have Sunday school together in class instead of individually via YouTube video & we have potlucks & community groups to try & tie those bonds a little tighter.  Jay will often make the point that one of the ways we can get more Sanctified (or more Christ-like) is in helping one another along the path of growing in more Christ-likeness. So being involved.
            Being ecclesiastical is also why some things we regulate like guidelines for eldership, baptism, membership, and stuff like that. Stuff at Calvary isn’t just anything goes because we are actually trying to mimic how the NT tells us to run the church & what to do & what not to do.  That in itself is also being very Baptistic, as Baptists were often called people of the Book.
However this also means there are some things that we leave to a liberty of conscience, I’m a political Libertarian, meaning I don’t want to make a hard & fast rule or law about every single scenario that may come to past.  There are areas that we just have to use our intelligence to figure out for ourselves & we’re not going to tell you how to finance you house or what color shirt to wear to church or more theologically what view of the end times you should hold, even within the Elders we don’t all agree on that subject & its okay.

IV – a Baptist is an evangelical, ecclesiastical, confessional Christian
            Historically Christianity has always used various creeds & confessions as ways to help articulate & clarify beliefs & to help prevent against reoccurring errors in the Church. This could be anything from the small phrase “Jesus is Lord” which in the NT was a sort of rebellious rallying cry that Christians aught to obey God even over the Government which said “Caesar is Lord” in Jesus’ day or like pharaoh who considered himself a god on earth or even in more modern times like the Korean Dictators Kim Jung-Un & Kim Jung-Il who have both made themselves out to be gods & expected worship from their people.
            A few famous creeds & confessions from Church History are the Apostles Creed, the Cannons of Orange 529, the Augsburg Confession 1530, the 39 Articles 1571, Synod of Dort 1618, the Westminster & the Baptist Confession of 1689. I absolutely love the Baptist 1689, I’d be happy to print or email you a copy of it if you were interested in reading about the beliefs of Baptists coming out of the Reformation; I think it really sums up what it means to be Baptist. 
Wrap-up
            Okay so let’s wrap up what questions do you have for me? Doctrines, Church History, Astrophysics, Ancient Civilizations, Marvel comics, this church, anything? Hit me.
A closing quote from the famous Baptist preacher C. H. Spurgeon, I recollect my mother saying to me, “I prayed that you might be a Christian, but I never prayed that you might be a Baptist;” but, nevertheless, I became a Baptist, for, as I reminded my mother, the Lord was able to do for her exceeding abundantly above what she had even asked or thought, and He did it.  

Monday, November 14, 2016

What's more important than a US Presidential election? Almost everything.

For as much as Evangelicals tend to mock the Priests & Scribes in Scripture for their focus on merely momentary social & political issues of their time & not the deeper, Heavenly Truths taught by Christ this most recent US presidential election should have been a real eye-opener, that we haven't "evolved" much from the error of our spiritual forefathers 2000 years ago. #whatsmoreimportant

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Reviewing possibility for female deaconesses (non-ordained)


Women Deacons (Pro/Con) the Bible 05-06-2014

My opinion deacons can be women and we already have many women deacons even if we refuse to recognize them as such (as example - many of, if not most of our wives for instance). 

1st question is are we limited to ONLY doing what the Bible say or ONLY restricting what the Bible says NOT to do. This may impact the question at hand.

Pro – Romans 16:1 Phoebe is recommended to the Church of Rome as a deaconess already.

I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant (or deaconess) of the church at Cenchreae, 2 that you may welcome her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints, and help her in whatever she may need from you, for she has been a patron of many and of myself as well. 3 Greet Prisca and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, 4 who risked their necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks but all the churches of the Gentiles give thanks as well. 5 Greet also the church in their house.

                  Con – S thinks a slippery slope and will lead to liberalism and is against it & I think the implication in 1 Timothy 3 is its men (although not explicitly)

Deacons likewise must be dignified, not double-tongued, not addicted to much wine, not greedy for dishonest gain. 9 They must hold the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience. 10 And let them also be tested first; then let them serve as deacons if they prove themselves blameless. 11 (“Their” isn’t in the original Greek) Wives (or Women) likewise must be dignified, not slanderers, but sober-minded, faithful in all things. 12 Let deacons each be the husband of one wife (non-polygamous), managing their children and their own households well. 13 For those who serve well as deacons gain a good standing for themselves and also great confidence in the faith that is in Christ Jesus.

**When reviewed more in detail later it seems Paul is giving the category of Male & Female deacons otherwise it makes no sense why there is expectation of Deacon wives & not Elder wives. There is an interesting lack of the He, He, His language in the Overseer section** 

The Early church

Aside from Paul’s writings other Early Church references can be found for the role of deaconesses. The deaconess ministry is mentioned by early Christian writers such as Clement of Alexandria and Origen.  Secular evidence from the early 2nd century confirms it. In a letter Pliny of Bithynia attests to the role of the deaconesses. Pliny refers to "two maid-servants" as deaconesses whom he tortures to find out more about the Christians. This establishes the existence of the office of the deaconesses in parts of the eastern Roman Empire from the earliest times. Fourth-century Fathers of the Church, such as Epiphanius, Basil of Caesarea, John Chrysostom and Gregory of Nyssa accept the ministry of female deacons as a fact. And both the Council of Nicea in 325  (Cannon 19) Likewise in the case of their deaconesses, and generally in the case of those who have been enrolled among their clergy, let the same form be observed. And we mean by deaconesses such as have assumed the habit, but who, since they have no imposition of hands, are to be numbered only among the laity & Council of Chalcedon of 451 (A woman shall not receive the laying on of hands as a deaconess under forty years of age, and then only after searching examination) both reference women deaconesses.

Early Church on 1 Tim 3 -In the late second century, Clement of Alexandria (155–220) indicated that this text presented evidence for the existence of diakonon gunaik n (“women deacons”). John Chrysostom and Theodoret, writing in the fourth and fifth centuries respectively, also understood these women to be female deacons.

On Romans passage - Early church writers give their own interpretation of this passage. Origen (185–254) interprets Paul’s statement to teach, “that there were women ordained in the church’s ministry.”2 About Phoebe and the other women of Romans 16, John Chrysostom (c. 347–407) wrote: “You see that these were noble women, hindered in no way by their sex in the course of virtue; and this is as might be expected for in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female.”3 Theodoret (393–460) noted Phoebe as “a woman deacon, prominent and noble. She was so rich in good works performed as to have merited the praise of Paul.”4
Somewhere between A.D. 111 and 113, Pliny the Younger, governor of Bithynia, wrote to the Emperor Trajan asking how he should deal with Christians. In the letter, he tells of questioning two women, who were called ministrae, the Latin equivalent of diakonos.7 Accordingly, I judged it all the more necessary to find out what the truth was by torturing two female slaves who were called deaconesses. But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition.
The Didascalia Apostolorum [Teaching of the Apostles], undoubtedly from the eastern part of the empire and composed in the third century, gives specific instructions about the role of men and women church workers: “Therefore, O bishop, appoint yourself workers of righteousness, helpers who cooperate with you unto life. Those that please you out of all the people you shall choose and appoint as deacons: on the one hand, a man for the administration of the many things that are required, on the other hand a woman for the ministry of women.”9
Tomb inscriptions also provide evidence that female deacons served the church. Among others, an inscription found in the vicinity of the Mount of Olives tells of “Sophia the Deacon.” Dated to the second half of the fourth century, the tombstone reads: “Here lies the slave and bride of Christ, Sophia, the deacon (h diakonos), the second Phoebe.”10 As a “bride of Christ,” Sophia would have been celibate.

A compelling example is the stone pictured above, found by workers at the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem on December 8, 1903. Probably dating from the fourth century, the Greek translates as “Here lies the slave and bride of Christ, Sophia, the deacon, the second Phoebe, who fell asleep in peace on March 21st during the 11th indiction…” The inscription’s subsequent lines are broken or missing, which is especially unfortunate because line 8 likely names a presbyter (pres-) that may have helped us to date and situate the artifact.





At the Council of Chalcedon (451), the ordination of deaconesses is expressly called ordination by the imposition (laying on) of hands. Members of the Council agreed that “a woman shall not receive the laying on of hands as a deaconess under forty years of age, and then only after searching examination.”

@@@
While not all together 100% clear (& personally I'd like more NT proof texts), the evidence seems pretty large for at least the possibility if not the certainty of a role for "deaconess" in the local church.  


Sunday, October 23, 2016

Worship Elements from the NT

Worship Elements from the NT

@@@

Scripture read - 1 Timothy 4:13

Homile - Sermon/message - Acts 20:7

Confession of Faith - 1 Timothy 3:16

Singing - Colossians 3:16

the Prayers - Acts 2:42

Congregational 'Amen' - 1 Corinthians 14:16

Physical action (lifting hands) - 1 Timothy 2:8

Thanksgiving - Luke 22:19-20

Remembrance - 1 Corinthians 11:25

Anticipation of Christ's Return - 1 Corinthians 11:26

Intercession - John 17:1

Kiss of Peace - Romans 16:16

Saturday, October 1, 2016

Ligonier Survey

Ligonier's recent survey of people who identify as "evangelical" is summarized well by this chart. "Evangelical" used to mean the belief in Scripture as God's inspired, inerrant Word and faith in Jesus is the only way for sinners to be saved.

Now "Evangelical" means Evangellyfish and is a worthless position as it relates to historic Christianity. SO much more could be said....

Sunday, September 4, 2016

Edifying Thoughts of a Tobacco Smoker - J S Bach







Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) is far more well known as a composer than a poet.  But in fact he wrote some poetry, including this little ditty about pipe smoking.

Edifying Thoughts of a Tobacco Smoker

Whene’re I take my pipe and stuff it
And smoke to pass the time away,
My thoughts as I sit there and puff it,
Dwell on a picture sad and grey:
It teaches me that very like
Am I myself unto my pipe.
Like me, this pipe so fragrant burning
Is made of naught but earth and clay;
To earth I too shall be returning.
It falls and, ere I’d think to say,
It breaks in two before my eyes;
In store for me a like fate lies.
No stain the pipe’s hue yet doth darken;
It remains white. Thus do I know
That when to death’s call I must harken
My body too, all pale will grow
To black beneath the sod ’twill turn.
Or when the pipe is fairly glowing,
Behold then, instantaniously,
The smoke off into thin air going,
Till naught but ash is left to see.
Man’s frame likewise away will burn
And unto dust his body turn.
How oft it happens when one’s smoking:
The stopper’s missing from the shelf,
And one goes with one’s finger poking
Into the bowl and burns oneself.
If in the pipe such pain doth dwell,
How hot must be the pains of Hell.
Thus o’er my pipe, in contemplation
Of such things, I can constantly
Indulge in fruitful meditation
And so, puffing contentedly,
On land, on sea, at home, abroad,
I smoke my pipe and worship God.

Johann Sebastian Bach

Saturday, August 6, 2016

Sunday school John 18:1-27


Jesus, You're Under Arrest!  - Recommendation Gospel of John on Netflix (docudrama) 

Most of us would hate the thought of being arrested and brought to trial. If we were guilty of a crime, being arrested would be humiliating. But if we were innocent, it would be devastating. Yet in what should have been a demeaning experience for Jesus, we see again his majesty and glory. Jesus uses the experiences of attack, betrayal and abandonment to demonstrate his confident trust in the Father. His calm assurance will help us face life's hurts and injustices with the same trust in the same Father.
Read John 18:1-27 
(on the board)
Themes:
Jesus & God same (John is big on the Incarnation)
Peter & Jesus opposites
Jesus: sovereign to save (friends), but willing to die (for enemies)
Jews: violence to Jesus, Jesus: peace to the Jews

In the Garden: vv 1-11
Why would Jesus go to a place where Judas knew Jesus might be found (vv. 1-3)?
Answer- He intended to be found.

18:3 – the chief priests expected resistance to Jesus’ arrest that’s why they sent armed soldiers, also they’d sent soldiers to arrest Jesus once before (John 7) & they came back empty handed the soldiers reporting, “No one ever spoke like this man!” This time they mean to get it right.

18:4 – Jesus was ready to be arrested & did not attempt to flee or escape what he knew was coming; what the Father had sent him to do. Also this verse states Jesus is omniscient like God, (all-knowing).  
  • When the soldiers say they are seeking Jesus of Nazareth, Jesus replies "I am he" (lit. "I am"; v. 5). How would you explain the reaction of the soldiers falling back (v. 6)? Or why is this important? Read: Ex 3:13-22 the great I AM of the OT is God himself, Jesus is God incarnate.
18:8 – Jesus shows even here his concern for his friends even in his time of trial, asking soldiers twice, “who do you seek?” reminds the soldiers its just Jesus (not the disciples they’re after).

18:10 – Peter strikes out to defend Jesus, Luke 22 tell us additionally how Jesus heals this Jew even as he’s being unjustly arrested by him (Jesus passive, Peter violent & Jesus peace to the Jews)  
·       What did Peter do to protect Jesus? (Think: Why would he have done this?
·       In what way was Peter right or wrong?)
·       What did Jesus say to Peter and why?

18:11 – “put away your sword” this is to say, this is why I came: to be arrested, tried, killed. “The Cup” Jesus mentions is the Cup of God’s wrath which is an image used a lot in the OT from Psalms & Jeremiah. Jesus accepts his role to drink this cup of God’s wrath against sin & die for sinners.

Jesus faces Annas & Caiaphas: vs 12-14 & 19-24

The Jews’ anger was against Jesus was for calling himself God’s Son but the story changes pretty soon as they have to “trump” up treason charges to get the Romans (who could put him to put him to death as a traitor)
·       What did the high priest ask Jesus, and how did Jesus respond (vv 19-21)? (Think: What
·       point was Jesus making?)
·       What did Jesus say in response of being hit (vv 23)?

There is a laundry list of irregularities & inconsistencies based off the “Mishnah” order for Sanhedrin & Jewish law that show this was a sham trial against Jesus

            Meeting at night, death penalty decided on 1st day of hearing or trial, false   evidence, false witnesses, Jesus a bound prisoner was assaulted by the
            “prosecution” during hearing, it was even illegal to meet on eve of the Sabbath or eve of a feast day.

Peter’s denial: vs 15 -18 & 25-27
            Who is the disciple with Peter following Jesus? John (we assume, several times   in the gospel he refers to himself without saying “me”)
·       What accusation was made against Peter and how did he respond?
·       Where was Peter standing and what was he doing there (v18)?

Peter says “I am NOT” spoke while comforting himself by the fire while Jesus (the true I AM) is uncomforted, suffering injustice & violence. Peter “the Cowardly Lion” lies to escape fear of any inclusion with Jesus or mutual embarrassment or punishment.

Applying the Word

  • What can we learn from Peter's failure about being ready to stand against the world's challenges?      I like us to be the opposite of Peter, meaning both non=violent and unafraid to speak in defense of Christ.
  • How will this study change the way you will face a time of testing in your own life?

Responding in Prayer

Ask God to make you ready to face difficulties with grace.